Agency, Power, and Injustice in Metalinguistic Disagreement

Abstract In this paper, I explain the kinematics of non-ideal metalinguistic disagreement. This occurs when one speaker has greater control in joint activity pairing contents with words a context. argue that some forms disagreement are deeply worrying, namely those involves certain power imbalances. such cases, possesses illegitimate owing to operation identity prejudice. call injustice. The wrong restricting from participating processes determine epistemic/linguistic resources conversation, and/or undermining speaker's ability affect outcomes.